Based on Buzzfeed’s article, 14 of the Most Remote and Extreme Cities Around the World, I decided to find out whether there are Tinder users in these remote places.

1. Ittoqqortoormiit, Greenland

  • Population: 450
  • Tinder: No

Gerald Zinnecker / Flickr: zinnie

2. Longyearbyen, Svalbard

  • Population: 2,075 (2013)
  • Tinder = Yes, about 40 or 3.6% of total female population (based on the world’s average female to male ratio of 1.07)

ogre64 /

3. Adak, Alaska, USA

  • Population: 326
  • Tinder: No

mbarrettimages /

4. Adamstown, Pitcairn Islands

  • Population: 50
  • Tinder: Yes, 1 or 3.7% of total female population

TheDoe /

5. Hanga Roa, Easter Island

  • Population: 3,300
  • Tinder: Yes, 17 or 0.96% of total female population

Flickr: lara68 / Creative Commons

6. Supai, Arizona, USA

  • Population: 208
  • Tinder: Yes, 1 or 0.90% of total female population

Flickr: fkehren / Creative Commons

7. Oymyakon, Russia

  • Population: 500
  • Tinder: No

Flickr: takens / Creative Commons

8. La Rinconada, Peru

  • Population: 50,000
  • Tinder: Yes, 20 or 0.07% of total female population

Getty Images/TAO Images RM

9. Edinburgh of the Seven Seas, Tristan da Cunha

  • Population: 268
  • Tinder: No

Flickr: briangratwicke / Creative Commons

10. Barrow, Alaska, USA

  • Population: 4,500
  • Tinder: Yes, 8 or 0.33% of total female population

George Burba /

But then this happened...

In the end, it is difficult to determine how many real Tinder users there are in these remote locations. While I'm not entirely certain on why spammers decided to place these bots in such inconspicuous places, I speculate that they were virtually seeded on random basis in each territory using geo targeting.

In the end, one thing seems to be certain. That is Tinder has created a world where physical reality and hyper reality can exist simultaneously. In this world, its citizens are made up of humans, bots and somewhere in between who/that are indistinguishable from one another.